careful
PGN VIEWER FROM CHESSTEMPO.COM info
GETTING STARTED WITH SETTINGS

Use keyboard cursor keys to scroll the game moves.

Start by hitting the blue circle containing the trigram, located just below the move list.

To set board colors: Click on the settings gear icon ⚙. Scroll verically and select the desired light / dark square combo. Click OK, and the settings will be saved.

To download the current game in pgn format: Click on the folder 📁 icon.

To auto-play the current game: Click on the circle with ► icon.

To add annotations to the current game: Click on the pencil ✎ icon.

We have a great chess club; it runs smoothly and efficiently, like a clock. All thanks to the expertise and cordial demeanors of the CCCR and RCC staff. Give it a shot and you'll fit right in!

Many players lose patience and quit in the first two weeks because they lose a few chess games. But things get better after a few dozen USCF-rated games.

You'll safely explore new or hidden aspects of your psychology. In society, at home or at work, the social contract dictates that we act nicely. Of course the same is true while playing chess. -With one small exception: in chess you can play any style you choose. Fast and aggressive, or slow and positional. Like many other activities, chess can be all about self-awareness.

Learn about yourself. Otherwise, what's the point? Yet, change can be difficult.

National Master Stephen Capp takes you on a journey into fighting chess. Games are rich with coffee-house tactical melees, bold sacrifices and 19th Century style king hunts... You will find very few draws here because nobody likes kissing your sister. Examine deadly attacking ideas arising from the Grand Prix Attack. This opening has been played at the highest level. Nigel Short, Anand, Carlsen and others have all scored important victories with it. You can, too. You can use it in response to the Pirc, and Modern Defence in addition to the Sicilian. There are games with gambits such as the Blackmar Diemer, the Elephant and Milner-Barry where you can learn to drag your opponents into 'deep dark forests' as Tal use to say. Tarrasch once said: 'Before the endgame, the gods have placed the middle game'. You will find very little endgame study in this game collection, -mostly just King hunts. They say, 'studying the endgame is like eating your vegetables'. Of course, learning the endgame is important. However, let's put the vegetables aside for now and dig into hot fudge sundaes and cheesecake. There are strategically rich games involving the main line Sicilian and various Ruy Lopez systems. There are two memorable battles in the Owen's defence which can't be missed.

FIDE Mas­ter (and USCF Se­nior Mas­ter) Igor Niko­layev's games in­clude 100's of gam­bit open­ings (King's gam­bit, Dan­ish and Scotch gam­bits, Evans gam­bit, Jaenisch-Schlie­mann Gam­bit, Smith-Morra gambit, Bu­dapest gam­bit, Blu­men­feld gam­bit, Benko gam­bit, Niko­layev gam­bit, some less known gam­bits). En­cy­clo­pe­dic ar­rays of 2.c3 Anti-Si­cil­ian (about two hun­dred games) and a splen­did Re­nais­sance of the Ponziani Open­ing (a few dozen games). Han­dling the French with­out the no­to­ri­ous pawn chains (~100 games). De­stroy­ing the Caro Kann with sim­ple tools the op­po­nents did­n’t study (~100 games). A bit of bru­tal vi­o­lence in the Scan­di­na­vian, Pirc and mod­ern de­fense (a few dozen games). Sur­pris­ingly ef­fi­cient rev­e­la­tions on both sides in the Two Knights and the Ital­ian Game (~200 games). Mak­ing White for­get 'milk­ing the cow' in the Span­ish Game (~100 games). Strate­gi­cally ag­gres­sive ap­proaches against the Queen's gam­bit, the Catalan Opening, the Eng­lish Open­ing, the Reti, the Colle, the Bird’s open­ing. Not to for­get Chig­or­in's De­fense with the ad­ven­tur­ous but con­vinc­ing early e7-e5, From's Gam­bit to its full ex­tent, and a real bomb in the Four Knights Open­ing. Still a lot more with any­thing in-be­tween, lead­ing to tense, dy­namic po­si­tions where imag­i­na­tive play and deep cal­cu­la­tions are most at home. At­tacks, com­bi­na­tions and tac­ti­cal strikes merge with many in­struc­tive endgames. And a bit of chess phi­los­o­phy, psy­chol­ogy and hu­mor.

A master player of the Sokolsky opening, which is far more than just a mere novelty. From a bold Orangutan on the queenside to the Sokolsky 'King’s Gambit'. The Veresov Opening is another hit of his. Robust conservative approach to the Ruy Lopez against various systems. Classical blockade ideas in the French as a universal method for White and a poisoned 3...b6 for Black. Impressive Caro Kann examples after 4.g4 with the following blockading e5-e6!? pawn sacrifice. With Isay you will love the Sicilian for either side. Black's repertoire is also submitted with the Alekhine's Defence, the modern Philidor Defence, the King's Indian, Pirc-Ufimtsev Defence. Includes games against legendary figures, some of whom he knew personally. A number of postal games which were recognized as masterpieces of correspondence chess. About a half century in master level competition allow you to say something important about chess.

scroll up
↩ [Event "Superbet Rapid 2022"] [Site "Warsaw POL"] [Date "2022.05.19"] [Round "2.4"] [White "Wojtaszek, Radoslaw"] [Black "Shevchenko, Kirill"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "2710"] [BlackElo "2644"] [PlyCount "236"] [EventDate "2022.05.19"] {In this strategically nice game, the young Ukrainian grandmaster confidently opposes the Polish super GM (on world top 15 in 2017).} 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6 $5 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6 $5 8.Bg5 ({This is one of the two most aggressive and principled lines against the Nikolaev Gambit. The other one is} 8.e4 $5 {The rest of the continuations don't seriously put my baby to the test.}) 8...Be7 ({Solid and logical. Black does not hurry to compromise his pawn structure and keeps developing without forcing an immediate thriller. The move has only one drawback (should we say such a thing playing as Black). Maintaining a comfortable compensation for the sacrificed pawn lowers Black's potential to play for a win. Therefore, much more often I preferred a sharper continuation} 8...Bb7 $5 {The move is more aggressive and risky. Black is ready to sacrifice his pawn structure for the sake of the triumph of the dynamic factors of the position.}) 9.Nxe7 ({It is bad for White to exchange even two pairs of minor pieces. After} 9.Nxf6+ $2 Bxf6 10.Bxf6 Qxf6 {Black's advantage in development is too big.}) 9...Qxe7 {I recall that back in 1988, in a team event, my teammate, a master, asked me about this position: "Why did you part with the important dark squared bishop so easily?" I replied: "It cost White two tempos and his most developed piece to go off the board, too. Not a bad trade for Black."} 10.Nf3 h6 ({This is more flexible than immediate} 10...Rb8 {White is asked to decide on the position of the bishop.}) 11.Bf4 ({White is not eager to solve interesting problems after} 11.Bh4 Rb8 12.b3 Rb6 $1 13.e3 Bb7 14.Be2 g5 15.Bg3 h5 $1) ({or} 11.Bh4 d5 12.e3 O-O 13.Be2 d4 $1) ({Even} 11.Bh4 c4 $6 {is playable, although less solid.Wojtaszek's desire not to take the bishop far away from the weakened queenside is understandable.}) 11...Qe4 $1 {But now White is hit by one of the main ideas of the Nikolaev Gambit.} 12.e3 Nb4 {The knight attack while Black is controlling the b1-h7 diagonal.} 13.Rc1 Nxa2 ({I like more the move} 13...Rxa2 $5 {Objectively, it doesn't give Black more, but it keeps more tension and a few more opportunities for White to err.} 14.-- (14.Bc4 Ba6 $1 15.Bxa6 Rxa6 $11) (14.Qd6 Nfd5 $1 $11 15.Qxc5 $5 Nxf4 16.Qxc8+ Ke7 17.Qxh8 $2 Nbd3+ $1 18.Bxd3 Qxd3 $1 19.exf4 Rxb2 {with an inevitable checkmate.})) 14.Rc4 Qb7 15.Be2 d5 16.Ra4 O-O 17.Rxa8 Qxa8 18.O-O Ne4 {The opening battle is over. Black has won back a pawn and has free play. Their chances are equal. During the short middlegame phase, both sides ingeniously seek out some of their own nuances, but neither can tip the scales even a bit in his favor.} 19.Re1 Nb4 20.Nd2 Ba6 21.Be5 Qc6 22.Nxe4 dxe4 23.Bxa6 Qxa6 24.Qg4 Qg6 25.Qxg6 fxg6 26.Bc3 Nd3 {In the resulting endgame, the black knight has good outposts and may turn out to be an even more useful piece than the white bishop.} 27.Rf1 g5 28.f3 exf3 29.gxf3 Re8 30.e4 g4 31.fxg4 Rxe4 32.h3 Re3 33.Kg2 g5 34.Rf3 Nf4+ 35.Kf2 Re2+ 36.Kf1 Rh2 37.Be5 Rh1+ 38.Kf2 Rh2+ 39.Kf1 Rh1+ 40.Kf2 Ng6 {While the highly experienced Radoslav has long ago offered a draw, it turns out that young Kirill is not averse to tormenting him a little. It is noteworthy that he even succeeds, but only to torment.} 41.Bc3 Nh4 42.Rf6 Rh2+ 43.Kf1 Rxh3 44.Rxh6 Rf3+ 45.Ke2 Rf4 46.Rc6 c4 47.Bd2 Re4+ 48.Kd1 Rxg4 49.Bxg5 Rxg5 50.Rxc4 { The next 70 or so moves could have been not made. But, firstly, although the chances of a rook with a knight are worse than those of a rook with a bishop against a lone rook, they still exist. And Capablanca, for example, considered these chances far from zero. Secondly, the players entered the blitz phase and were already playing on added seconds, which somewhat increased Black's practical chances of winning. But of course, for Wojtaszek, defending this ending was a piece of cake. A pretty good and clean game, after all. And an important acquisition in the piggy bank of my gambit.} Nf5 51.Kd2 Kf7 52.b4 Ke6 53.Rc5 Rg3 54.Rc8 Kd5 55.b5 Nd6 56.Rb8 Kc5 57.b6 Nc4+ 58.Ke2 Nxb6 59.Rd8 Nd5 60.Kf2 Rb3 61.Ke2 Kd4 62.Kf2 Rb6 63.Kf3 Rg6 64.Kf2 Rg7 65.Kf3 Rf7+ 66.Ke2 Rf6 67.Rd7 Ke4 68.Rd8 Nf4+ 69.Kd2 Ne6 70.Re8 Kd4 71.Ke2 Nf4+ 72.Kf3 Nd3+ 73.Kg3 Ne5 74.Ra8 Rf3+ 75.Kg2 Rc3 76.Ra4+ Ke3 77.Kg3 Rb3 78.Ra8 Ke4+ 79.Kf2 Ng4+ 80.Ke2 Rb2+ 81.Kd1 Ne5 82.Rd8 Nf3 83.Kc1 Rh2 84.Kb1 Nd4 85.Rg8 Kd3 86.Rg3+ Kc4 87.Rg8 Rf2 88.Rc8+ Kd3 89.Rg8 Nb5 90.Kc1 Rh2 91.Rg3+ Kc4 92.Rg8 Nd4 93.Rc8+ Kd3 94.Kb1 Rh6 95.Kb2 Rb6+ 96.Ka3 Nc6 97.Rh8 Kc4 98.Rh4+ Nd4 99.Ka2 Rf6 100.Rh8 Kc3 101.Rh3+ Nf3 102.Kb1 Rf5 103.Kc1 Rf4 104.Kb1 Kb3 105.Kc1 Kc3 106.Kb1 Rf8 107.Kc1 Rf6 108.Kb1 Kd2 109.Kb2 Nd4 110.Rh2+ Kd3 111.Rh3+ Kc4 112.Rc3+ Kb4 113.Rc8 Rf2+ 114.Kc1 Nb3+ 115.Kd1 Nc5 116.Ke1 Ra2 117.Rd8 Kc3 118.Kf1 Ne6 1/2-1/2 [Event "'Trud' Stadium Open"][Site "Borovichi (Russia)"][Date "1985.00.00"][ECO "A58"][Result "0-1"] [White "Kruglov, Oleg"][WhiteElo "0000"][Black "Nikolayev, Igor"][BlackElo "2255"] {My older and close friend Oleg Kruglov was a Russian chess expert, my second of that time and great promoter of the royal game in general. Chess was his beloved hobby, for he had a solid industrial profession. Later, when Gorby, Perestroika and Russian reforms arrived, Oleg became a prominent politician in Borovichi, the town of my childhood. This was the first official game where Nikolayev gambit was played.} 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6!? 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6!? 8.Bg5 Bb7 9.Bxf6 gxf6 10.e4?! Bxd5! 11.Qxd5 Nb4 12.Qd2 Qa5 13.Rc1 Bh6! 14.Qxh6 Nxa2+ 15.Kd1 Qa4+! 16.Ke1 Nxc1 17.Qxc1 Qxe4+ 18.Qe3? Ra1+ 19.Ke2 f5 20.Nh3 O-O 21.Kd2 Rfa8! 22.Rg1 Qb4+ 23.Kc2?! Qa4+ 24.Kc3 f4! 25.Nxf4 Qb4+ 26.Kc2 Rb8 27.Nd3? Qb3+ 28.Kd2 Qd1+ 29.Kc3 Rb3+ 30.Kc4 Ra4+ 31.Kd5 Qh5+ 32.Qe5 Rxd3+! {(I. Nikolayev)} [Event "Zenit Championship"][Site "Novgorod, Russia"][Date "1986.00.00"][ECO "A58"][Result "1/2-1/2"] [White "Iljinsky, Victor"][WhiteElo "2259"][Black "Nikolayev, Igor"][BlackElo "2255"]1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6 8.g3 {Not as good and aggressive as 8.Bg5 or 8.e4 and certainly not giving much Black problems. However it's a typical continuation for solid positional players. With this fianchetto White hopes to finish development while offering as few targets for the black pieces as possible. But this continuation can't achieve an advantage, like any other passive reaction to a gambit. Black pieces rapidly develop the power to control the board.} 8...Nxd5 9.Qxd5 Ra7! 10.Bg2 ({On} 10.Qe5+?! Be7! (10...Qe7 11.Qxe7 Bxe7 {is okay for equality}) 11.Qxg7 Bf6 12.Qg4 Bb7 13.Nf3 Nb4 {Black gets a dream position for this gambit! White barely can survive with two extra pawns.}) 10...Nb4 11.Qe4+ Be7 12.Nf3?! ({An immediate} 12.Qb1! {was necessary.}) 12...Bb7 13.Qb1? (13.Qc4 {keeps the position about equal while Black's initiative is obvious.}) 13...Qa8! {Honestly, quickly making this move, I thought the game was over. I was only surprised that Iljinsky made it so easy for me.} 14.O-O! {After this quiet reaction I realized what's going to be next.} 14...Be4 15.Ne1! {A nice trick to save the game. Nevertheless Black must be essentially better anyway.} 15...Bxb1 16.Bxa8 Bxa2! {Freezing the white rook and bishop.} 17.Be4 Bf6! 18.Nc2 Nxc2 19.Bxc2 Ke7 {White's position is difficult. Sooner or later the b2 pawn must fall, with normal defensive play.} 20.Be3! {Victor Iljinsky was a universal player who had a great sense what is good for what. Here he starts a forced tactical operation transferring into an endgame where due to limited material Black won't be able to convert an extra exchange for a pawn.} 20...d6 21.b4! Bxa1 22.bxc5! Ra6 23.Bd3 Raa8 24.Rxa1 Bd5 25.Rd1 dxc5 26.Bxc5+ Ke6 27.e4!? Bb3 28.Rb1 Rhc8 29.Be3 Bc2 30.Rb6+ Ke7 31.Rb7+ Kf8 32.Bxc2 Rxc2 {Formally, Black still has the upper hand but I doubt this ending could be won against a master. Accuracy is still required from White. Again Iljinsky finds an active plan to solve all problems for his bishop and e-pawn. The white rook is getting a passive defender then but Black can't make real progress.} 33.Bf4 Re2 34.Bd6+ Kg8 35.e5 h5 36.Rb3 h4! 37.gxh4! (37.Kg2 h3+ 38.Kxh3 Rxf2 {might be losing.}) 37...Ra4 38.Kg2 Rf4 39.Rf3 Rxh4 40.Kg3 Rd4 41.Bc7 Rd1 42.Kg2 Rc2 43.Bb8 {(I. Nikolayev)} [Event "Zenit Championship"][Site "Novgorod, Russia"][Date "1986.00.00"][ECO "A58"][Result "1/2-1/2"] [White "Iljinsky, Yaroslav"][WhiteElo "2124"][Black "Nikolayev, Igor"][BlackElo "2255"]{This game promised to be interesting even before it started. With 3.5/4 I was leading in this round robin championship. My 16-year-old opponent was the son of Victor Iljins whom I had played 4 rounds ago. I realized playing my gambit again risked encountering family opening preparations.} 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6 8.g3 {Again the same move Victor played here.} 8... Nxd5 9.Qxd5 Ra7 10.Bg2 Nb4 11.Qb3 ({Victor played} 11.Qe4+) 11...d5 (11...d6!? {is what I prefer today.}) 12.Nf3 ({On} 12.Bd2 c4 13.Qe3+ Re7 14.Qc3 Re6! {is strong threatening Nd3+}) 12...Bf5 13.O-O Nc2 14.Bf4! ({A strong positional exchange sacrifice which was the fruit of the homework. Later I found that} 14.Be3!? {is good enough for a draw.}) ({I expected here} 14.Rab1 Nb4{, a draw, which would not proven the efficacy of the gambit anyway. But fortunately I was wrong and things turned out to be more interesting.}) 14... Nxa1 15.Rxa1 {This seems to be another important position for this variation. Black started the gambit but faces a counter-gambit. Now it's White who is perfectly developed and ready to attack, and his material deficiency for that is very small.} 15...f6! {The only move. Otherwise the white knight goes to e5 with multiple threats.} 16.Nh4 Be6 17.e4! {Offering a whole piece now, but again not for free!} 17... g5 18.exd5 Bc8! {Again the only move. But how can White continue?} 19.d6! {I guess it all was prepared home even though Yaroslav started playing as slow as I did in this sharp and dangerous for Black position.} 19...Bxd6 {This only move was easy.} 20.Bxd6 Qxd6 21.Rd1 {Honestly, having my king exposed in the center after over twenty moves was not my original plan.} 21...c4! {However all threats and counters seem to be in balance.} 22.Qb5+ Bd7 23.Rxd6 (23.Re1+!?) 23...Bxb5 24.Rb6! gxh4 25.Rb8+ Kf7 26.Rxh8 Rxa2 27.Rxh7+ Kg6 {Finally after all complications we came to an equal but sharp endgame.} 28.Be4+ f5 29.Rb7 Rxb2 30.Rb6+ Kg7! 31.Bxf5 c3 32.Rg6+ Kf7 33.Rh6 hxg3 34.hxg3 c2 35.Bxc2 Rxc2 {Winning a piece provides only moral satisfaction. But the satisfaction of the entire game was great.} 36.f4 {Thus the Iljinsky family made a solid contribution to Nikolayev gambit. I was glad to find out that Yaroslav is a strong chess player now, with a FIDE rating of about 2300.} {(I. Nikolayev)} [Event "Khabarovsk Championship"][Site "Khabarovsk"][Date "1988.01.01"][ECO "B22"][Result "0-1"] [White "Gerasimov, Victor (FM)"][WhiteElo "2315"][Black "Nikolayev, Igor"][BlackElo "2289"] 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6!? 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6!? {Don't mix this up with the Benko-Volga Gambit. It's Nikolayev's gambit, shown in its richest strategical context!} 8.Bg5 Bb7 9.Bxf6 gxf6 10.Nf3 Bg7 11.e3 Qa5+ 12.Nc3 f5 13.Rc1?! Nb4 14.Qd2 Nxa2 15.Nxa2? Qxd2+ 16.Kxd2 Rxa2 17.Rxc5 Rxb2+ 18.Rc2 Rb1! {I declined a draw offer here.} 19.Ne1 Ke7 20.Rg1 Ra8 21.Bd3 Raa1 22.f3? f4! 23.exf4 Bd4 24.Rf1 Bb6 25.Ke2 Ba5 26.Rd2 Ba6! {Complete triumph and domination when pawns and pawn structures don't matter.} 27.Bxa6 Bxd2 28.Kxd2 Rxa6 29.h4 Ra2+ 30.Ke3 d5 {...except one particular pawn that still matters.} 31.g4 Rd1 {(I. Nikolayev)} [Event "Sayan Mountains Festival"] [Site "Abakan, Russia"] [Date "1988.07.28"] [Round "1"] [White "Poloskov"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A58"] [BlackElo "2272"] {Not that enchanting a Nikolayev Gambit game, let's say as Kruglov - Nikolayev, 1986 or Gerasimov - Nikolayev, 1988 (both played with the 8.Bg5 line as well). Expert Poloskov tries to meet my gambit wisely. Avoiding the fire of the most interesting paths, he is going to be content with a quiet equality. However even there, with not much material left, Black seizes a slight initiative, and White's mistakes are yet to come.} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. d5 b5 4. cxb5 a6 5. bxa6 e6 6. Nc3 exd5 7. Nxd5 Nxa6 $5 8. Bg5 Bb7 9. e4 $5 (9. Nxf6+ gxf6 10. Bd2 $5 Qb6 $13) 9... Be7 $1 10. Bxf6 (10. Nxe7 Qxe7 11. f3 O-O $44) 10... Bxf6 11. Bc4 (11. Qd2 $2 Bxd5 $1 12. exd5 Qe7+ 13. Be2 Nb4 $15 14. Nf3 $2 Bxb2 15. Rb1 Rxa2 $19) 11... Bxb2 (11... Nb4 $5 12. Nxb4 $2 Qa5 $1 $15 13. Bxf7+ $6 Ke7 14. Bb3 Qxb4+ 15. Qd2 Bxb2 16. Qxb4 cxb4 17. Rd1 Bc3+ 18. Kf1 Bxe4 19. Ne2 Rhe8 $15) (11... Nb4 $5 12. Nxf6+ Qxf6 13. Ne2 Bxe4 14. O-O $11) (11... Nb4 $5 12. Nc3 $1 Qe7 13. Nge2 Bxe4 14. O-O O-O 15. Re1 Bf5 16. Ng3 Be6 17. a3 Nc6 18. Nd5 Qd8 $11) 12. Rb1 Bxd5 13. Qxd5 Bc3+ 14. Kf1 O-O 15. Ne2 Qf6 (15... Bb4 $5 16. Rd1 Ra7 $11) 16. Qd3 $6 (16. Qxd7 Nb4 17. Qf5 $1 Nxa2 $11) 16... Be5 17. a3 Nb8 $5 (17... Rfb8 18. Rxb8+ (18. Rb3 $5) 18... Nxb8 19. g3 Bb2 20. f4 $132 Rxa3 21. Qd5 Qe7 $1 22. Kg2 $1 (22. Qb7 $6 Nc6 23. Qxb2 Rf3+ 24. Ke1 Qxe4 $40) 22... Ra4 23. Rb1 Rb4 24. Qa8 $44) 18. g3 Bb2 19. f4 $1 Rxa3 20. e5 (20. Qd5 $1 Nc6 21. Kg2 Bd4 22. Qxd7 $11) 20... Rxd3 (20... Qc6 $6 21. Qd5 Ra4 22. Qxc6 Nxc6 23. Bxf7+ Kxf7 24. Rxb2 $11) 21. exf6 Rd2 22. Ke1 Bc3 $1 23. Nxc3 Rc2 24. Bxf7+ $6 (24. Bd5 $1 Rxc3 25. Kd2 Ra3 26. Rb7 $11) 24... Kxf7 25. Ne4 gxf6 26. Kd1 Rg2 27. Nxc5 Nc6 $36 28. Rb7 Ra8 29. Rxd7+ $2 (29. Nb3 Ke7 30. Re1+ Kd8 31. Re2 Rxe2 32. Kxe2 Kc8 33. Rb5 Ra2+ 34. Ke3 Rxh2 $15) 29... Ke8 $1 (29... Kg6 $2 30. Nb3 Raa2 31. Nc1 $11) 30. Re1+ Ne5 31. Rd2 Ra1+ 32. Kc2 Ra2+ 33. Kb3 Raxd2 $19 34. fxe5 Rb2+ 35. Ka3 Rbe2 $1 36. Rxe2 Rxe2 37. exf6 Kf7 {With the white king cut off from the scene Black easily wins all the remaining pawns.} {(I. Nikolayev)} [Event "Russia Cup"] [Site "Krasnoyarsk"] [Date "1990.05.14"] [ECO "A58"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [White "Kiriakov, Petr"] [WhiteElo "2200"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [BlackElo "2346"] {GM Petr Kiriakov, then a 15-year-old candidate master, was the youngest contender in the tournament.} 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6!? 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6!? 8.e4! Be7 (8...Nxd5! {is what I play now.}) 9.Bc4 O-O 10.e5 Nxd5 11.Bxd5 Ra7 12.Nf3 Nb4 13.Bc4 d5 14.exd6 Bxd6 15.O-O Bb7 16.h3 {The same position occurred in my game with IM Lapshun 8 years later. NYS Championship, 1998} 16...Be4 ({In my game with Lapshun I continued} 16...Qf6 ({but probably} 16...Be4 {still is better.})) 17.Bd2 Rd7! 18.Bb5?! Bh2+! 19.Nxh2 Rxd2 20.Qh5 Qb6 21.a4 Bd3 22.Rfd1 Rxd1+ 23.Rxd1 Bxb5 24.axb5 Qxb5 25.Nf3 Nd3 26.Nd4 {(I. Nikolayev)} [Event "Russia Cup"] [Site "Krasnoyarsk, Russia"] [Date "1990.05.15"] [Round "7"] [White "Polyakova, Natalia (WFM)"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "2152"] [BlackElo "2346"] [PlyCount "58"] {Not the strongest, but definitely an interesting and witty attempt to refute the Nikolayev Gambit, was undertaken by the many times women champion of the Pskov region of Russia, WIM (since 1999) Natalia Polyakova.} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. d5 b5 4. cxb5 a6 5. bxa6 e6 6. a7 $5 {Natalia saw my game vs. Petr Kiriakov, two rounds earlier, and prepared a cute tactical idea.} Na6 $5 {After diving into the position for a while, I didn't find her idea really dangerous. Black can take the a7 pawn provided that he ignores the next gift (which was not difficult to anticipate). However, I was not sure whether Black's compensation for a pawn will be any better than in the positions of my gambit I'm used to. Therefore I was pleased to figure out that I probably still can keep development in the best traditions of the Nikolayev Gambit. The following course of the game proved the power of this principled decision.} (6... Rxa7 7. dxe6 fxe6 8. e4 $5 d5 $44 { This is the way I was going to play should I take on a7.} (8... Nxe4 $5 9. Qh5+ g6 $2 10. Qe5 $18 {with a tripple attack decides the game at once.}) ({ Later I discovered that after} 8... Nxe4 $5 9. Qh5+ Ke7 $13 { Black should be okay.})) 7. dxe6 ({Interestingly, White already cannot comfortably switch to the aggressive Kiriakov's (and many strong players followers after him) line because after} 7. Nc3 exd5 8. Nxd5 Rxa7 9. e4 { Black already has his rook on a7, which definitely gets an improved version of the gambit.}) 7... fxe6 8. e4 $6 { After long thinking Natalia persistently pursues her original idea.} Nxe4 $1 { Now Black is good to take the pawn safely.} 9. Qh5+ $6 { It was time to start looking for an equality.} (9. Qf3 $1 d5 10. Bb5+ Bd7 11. Bxa6 Qa5+ 12. Nd2 Nxd2 13. Bxd2 Qxa6 14. Qh5+ g6 15. Qe5 Rg8 16. Qb8+ Kf7 17. Qf4+ $11) 9... g6 10. Qe5 Nf6 11. Bg5 (11. Bb5 $6 Be7 $1 12. Qxe6 Nc7 13. Qb6 Nxb5 14. Qxb5 Rxa7 $36 {With excellent compensation.}) 11... Be7 $1 12. Nc3 O-O 13. Nb5 $5 {Hats off! This is a decision of a true fighter. The move is very risky but interesting again, and practically the only chance to keep an intrigue. Otherwise Black gets a superior position for free.} Nb4 { Black begins to unfold his powerful spring against the white army that is not ready yet for a direct clash. White's only trump is his dangerous and well protected a-passer. But the trump is really good.} (13... d5 $15) ({ Already there was a spectacular, very difficult to spot, win after} 13... Ng4 $1 14. Bxe7 Qxe7 15. Qe4 Nxf2 16. Qxa8 Qg5 $1 17. Be2 (17. Qb8 $2 Qe3+ 18. Be2 Nd3+ 19. Kd1 Rf1+ $1 20. Bxf1 Nf2+ 21. Kc2 Nb4+ 22. Kb1 Qe1#) 17... Qe3 $1 18. a3 c4 19. Nf3 Nd3+ 20. Kd1 Nxb2+ 21. Kc2 $1 Qxe2+ 22. Kb1 Nd1 $1 23. Ra2 Qd3+ 24. Kc1 Nc5 25. Rd2 Nb3+ 26. Kxd1 Qb1+ 27. Ke2 Qxh1 $19) 14. Qb8 (14. Rc1 Ba6 $17) (14. O-O-O Nxa2+ (14... Ng4 $5) 15. Kb1 Nb4 $17) (14. Bxf6 Qa5 $1 (14... Rxf6 $17) 15. Bxe7 Nd3+ 16. Kd1 Nxe5 17. Bxf8 Kxf8 $19) 14... Nc2+ (14... Ba6 $5 15. Qxd8 Bxd8 $17) 15. Kd1 Rxb8 16. axb8=Q {The omnivorous pawn made an absolutely dizzying career! I doubt that of a million games played with Benko Gambit, the original c-pawn would ever promote. No way! Its even then remarkable path would always end on a6. The Nikolayev Gambit is a totally different quest. It gives opportunities, it makes miracle happen.} Nxa1 17. Nf3 {Let's sum up. Material is equal. The black knight on a1 looks doomed. In return, the white army is essentially underdeveloped and the king is weak. Who is the knight on a1, a hopeless captive or a dangerous diversionist behind enemy lines? Answering the question solves the battle.} Qa5 $40 18. Na3 Ba6 19. Qf4 Nd5 20. Qd2 Qa4+ 21. Kc1 Bxg5 22. Nxg5 c4 $1 23. Qd4 $1 (23. Ne4 c3 24. Nxc3 Nxc3 25. Bxa6 Qxa6 26. Qxc3 Rc8 $19) 23... Nb4 $1 (23... Rf4 24. Ne4) 24. Bxc4 Bxc4 (24... Rc8 $2 25. Qf6 $1 Rxc4+ $1 (25... Rf8 $2 26. Bxe6+ $1 dxe6 27. Qxe6+ Kg7 28. Qe7+ Kh6 29. Qxf8+ Kh5 30. g4+ Kh4 31. Qh6+ Kxg4 32. Rg1+ Kf4 33. Qf8+ Ke5 34. Re1+ Kd5 35. Qd8+ Kc5 36. Ne6+ Kc6 37. Qc7+ Kd5 38. Re5#) 26. Kb1 Rf4 $1 27. Qd8+ $1 Rf8 28. Qe7 Rxf2 29. Qxh7+ Kf8 30. Qh6+ Ke7 31. Qg7+ Kd8 32. Nf7+ Rxf7 33. Qxf7 Nac2 34. Qf6+ Kc7 35. Rc1 Bd3 36. Qc3+ Kb6 37. Rxc2 Bxc2+ 38. Nxc2 Qxa2+ 39. Kc1 Nxc2 40. Kxc2 $11) 25. Qxc4 Nac2 $1 $19 26. Qb3 (26. Nxc2 $2 Nxa2+ $19) 26... Qxb3 27. axb3 Rxf2 28. g3 $6 Nd3+ 29. Kb1 Nd4 {(Igor Nikolayev)} [Event "Marchand Open"] [Site "Rochester, NY"] [Date "1998.04.15"] [Round "4"] [White "Buehl, Walter"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "2058"] 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6 {We've got the Nikolayev gambit on the board.} 8.g3 {Not as good and aggressive as 8.Bg5 or 8.e4 and certainly not giving much Black problems. However it's a typical continuation for solid positional players. With this fianchetto White hopes to finish development while offering as few targets for the black pieces as possible. But this continuation can't achieve an advantage, like any other passive reaction to a gambit. Black pieces rapidly develop the power to control the board.} 8...Nxd5 9.Qxd5 Ra7 10.Bg2 ({On} 10.Qe5+ $6 Be7 $1 (10...Qe7 11.Qxe7+ Bxe7 {is okay for equality}) 11.Qxg7 Bf6 12.Qg4 Bb7 13.Nf3 Nb4 {Black gets a dream position for this gambit! White barely can survive with two extra pawns.}) 10...Nb4 11.Qb3 {First time this position happened in Iljinsky, Yaroslav - Nikolayev, 1986, Russia.} d6 $5 ({In that game I played } 11...d5 {and in it ended in a draw after a sharp tactical battle:} 12.Nf3 Bf5 13.O-O Nc2 14.Bf4 $1 Nxa1 15.Rxa1 f6 $1 16.Nh4 Be6 17.e4 $1 g5 18.exd5 Bc8 $1 19.d6 $1 Bxd6 20.Bxd6 Qxd6 21.Rd1 c4 $1 22.Qb5+ Bd7 23.Rxd6 Bxb5 24.Rb6 $1 gxh4 25.Rb8+ Kf7 26.Rxh8 Rxa2 27.Rxh7+ Kg6 28.Be4+ f5 29.Rb7 Rxb2 30.Rb6+ Kg7 $1 31.Bxf5 c3 32.Rg6+ Kf7 33.Rh6 hxg3 34.hxg3 c2 35.Bxc2 Rxc2 36.f4 {1/2}) 12.a3 Bf5 $1 13.e4 Be6 14.Qc3 Qa5 15.Kf1 Qb5+ 16.Ne2 Bc4 17.Bf3 Nc6 {For the sacrificed pawn Black obtained a strong initiative that secures at least equal chances.} 18.a4 $5 Qa6 $5 ({On} 18...Rxa4 19.Rxa4 Qxa4 20.Kg2 Ne5 21.Nf4 Be7 {Black could secure a tiny edge. But I wanted to keep the position more complicated.}) 19.b3 Bd3 20.Ra2 Nd4 $2 {Overlooking White's strong answer.} (20...Ne5 {was the right move.}) 21.Rd2 $1 Bxe2+ 22.Bxe2 Qb7 23.Rb2 $2 ({White misses excellent winning chances with an exchange sacrifice} 23.Rxd4 $1 cxd4 24.Qxd4) 23...Qxe4 {Again Black is good and on his way for more.} 24.f3 Qd5 25.Kf2 Be7 26.Bc4 Qf5 27.Qd3 Qd7 28.Qe4 O-O {Who said that castling on move 28 is too late?} 29.Be3 Bf6 30.Rbb1 Re8 31.Qg4 Qc6 $5 (31...Qxg4 {Black's better}) 32.Bxd4 Bxd4+ 33.Kg2 Rae7 $5 {Just before the first time control Black sacrifices an exchange where there is no risk to lose while White, having a bad king should be very careful.} 34.Bb5 Re2+ 35.Bxe2 Rxe2+ 36.Kh3 d5 37.Rhe1 $2 {And here the it comes.} h5 $1 ({Walter prepared a trading trick:} 37...Qh6+ 38.Qh4 Qe6+ 39.g4 {and the white rook is protected. But he overlooks a killing move of Black's.}) 38.Qxh5 Qe6+ 39.g4 $2 ({After the correct} 39.Qg4 Rxe1 40.Rxe1 Qxe1 41.Qc8+ Kh7 42.Qf5+ Kh6 43.Qxf7 Qe5 {Black is winning, but still it's playable.} ) 39...Rxe1 40.Rxe1 Qxe1 41.Qxd5 Qf1+ 42.Kg3 g6 43.g5 Qe1+ 44.Kg2 Qe2+ 45.Kg3 Bg1 {(I. Nikolayev)} [Event "New York State Ch."] [Site "Saratoga Springs, NY"] [Date "1998.09.06"] [Round "4"] [White "Lapshun, Yury (IM)"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "2530"] [BlackElo "2304"] [PlyCount "56"] [EventDate "1998.??.??"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. d5 b5 4. cxb5 a6 5. bxa6 e6 $5 6. Nc3 exd5 7. Nxd5 Nxa6 $5 8. e4 $1 Be7 $6 {Not the strongest continuation in this line of the Nikolayev Gambit, with a gorgeous score for me though.} ({ The fundamental improvement} 8... Nxd5 $1 { will be revealed only next year in Hayes - Nikolayev, 1999 Marchand Open.}) 9. Bc4 O-O 10. e5 Nxd5 11. Bxd5 Ra7 12. Nf3 Nb4 13. Bc4 d5 14. exd6 Bxd6 15. O-O Bb7 16. h3 Qf6 $6 ({ In 1990 vs the future grandmaster Petr Kiriakov I played in this position} 16... Be4 {which was better, even though I drew then. In this game I was lucky to win but the novelty was not an improvement.}) 17. Qe2 $5 Bc6 $1 18. Rd1 Re8 19. Be3 $6 (19. Bg5 $1) 19... Be4 $2 (19... Bf4) 20. Rd2 Nc6 21. Rad1 Bf8 22. Rd7 $2 {"White has finally neutralized Black's opening initiative, which means Black has nothing for the pawn. And after 22.b3 and 23.Bd5 (or 23. Ne1) White would be well on his way to collecting the point. However, it is very difficult to stay to in a defensive frame of mind for the entire game. White felt that he had weathered all of Black's threats and it was time to punish him for his early aggression. The problem is that his move provides Black with the target that he needs to get counterplay." - IM Ronald Burnett. I would like to add that Yury, struggling hard with my gambit, spent too much time in the opening and by this position already was in very severe time trouble.} Bxf3 23. gxf3 (23. Qxf3 Qxf3 24. gxf3 Rxd7 25. Rxd7 Ne5 26. Bb5 Nxd7 27. Bxd7 Rd8 $17) 23... Rxd7 24. Rxd7 Ne5 25. Ra7 Nxf3+ 26. Kf1 (26. Kh1 Ne5 27. Bd5 Qf5 28. Bg2 c4 $15) (26. Kg2 Ne5 27. Bd5 Qg6+ 28. Kf1 Rd8 $15) 26... Ne5 $15 27. Bg5 $2 $138 (27. Bd5 Qf5 28. Kg2 Qg6+ $15) 27... Qc6 $1 $19 (27... Qxg5 28. Bxf7+ Nxf7 29. Qxe8) 28. Kg1 Nf3+ {(I. Nikolayev)} [Event "Marchand Open"][Site "Rochester, NY"] [Date "1999.03.27"] [Round "13"] [White "Hayes, David (NM)"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "2268"] [BlackElo "2320"] {White loses the opening battle but then fights very well to save the game in an evidently lost ending (not easy though) a pawn down. A very important game for my gambit, too.} 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6 8.e4 Nxd5! ({This came as a strong improvement compared to} 8...Be7 {what I had played before this game, with a gorgeous score though.}) 9.exd5?! (9.Qxd5 {is stronger, even though Black gets a lot of play against the advanced white queen and the e4 pawn. It'll be shown in further games.}) 9... Nb4 10.Bc4 {At first look White's position may seem a solid extra pawn.} 10... Qe7+! {The core idea of this variation.} 11.Be3 Qe4 12.Rc1 Nxa2 13.Rc2 Qxg2 14.Qf3! {Seriously, trading queens is least troubling for White here.} 14... Qxf3 15.Nxf3 Bd6 16.Bxa2!? Rxa2 17.O-O! O-O 18.Bxc5 Bxc5 19.Rxc5 Rxb2 20.Rfc1 Bb7 21.Ra5! {White is losing and his only chance is the play against the limited black bishop. David does it impressively.} 21...f6 22.Rc7 Rf7 23.Nd4 d6 ( 23...g6!? ) 24.Rxf7 Kxf7 25.Nf5 Rb6 26.Rb5! Rxb5 27.Nxd6+ Ke7?! ({After the correct} 27...Kg6 28.Nxb5 Bxd5 29.Nd6 Kg5 {it should be a draw anyway.}) 28.Nxb5 g5 29.Kg2! Bxd5+ 30.Kg3 f5 31.f4 h6 32.fxg5 hxg5 33.h4 {(I. Nikolayev)} [Event "RCC Sat. Open"] [Site "Rochester, NY"] [Date "1999.04.24"] [Round "3"] [Result "0-1"] [White "Williams, Vance "] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "2056"] [BlackElo "2315"] [PlyCount "84"] 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6 6.dxe6 fxe6 7.Nc3 Nxa6 8.e4 Bb7 9.Bd3 Nb4 10.Bb1 Be7 11.Nge2 O-O 12.O-O d5 13.exd5 exd5 14.Bg5 d4 15.Bxf6 Bxf6 16.Ne4 d3 17.Nxf6+ Rxf6 18.Ng3 Qd5 19.f3 Qd4+ 20.Rf2 Re8 21.a3 Rfe6 22.Qb3 Kh8 23.Qc3 Re1+ 24.Nf1 Ba6 25.Qxd4 cxd4 26.axb4 d2 27.Rxa6 d1=Q 28.Be4 Rd8 29.b5 d3 30.b6 d2 31.b7 Qb3 32.b8=Q Rxb8 33.Rxd2 Qe3+ 34.Rf2 Rxf1+ 35.Kxf1 Qc1+ 36.Ke2 Rxb2+ 37.Kd3 Rb3+ 38.Kd4 Qe3+ 39.Kd5 Rb5+ 40.Kc6 Rc5+ 41.Kd7 Qd4+ 42.Ke7 Rc7+ {(Igor Nikolayev)} [Event "RCC Sat. Open"][Site "Rochester, NY"] [Date "2000.09.23"] [White "Manning, John"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "1850"] [BlackElo "2409"]1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6 8.Nxf6+?! Qxf6 9.Nf3 Nb4 10.a3? ({White should continue} 10.e4! Rxa2 11.Rxa2 Nxa2 12.Bc4 Nxc1 13.Qxc1 Be7 14.O-O O-O {with an equal position, O'Keefe, Patrick 2005 - Nikolayev 2368, RCC Sat Open, Rochester NY, 11/24/2007}) 10... Qf5! 11.Kd2 Ra6! {(I. Nikolayev)} [Event "Syracuse Open"] [Site "Rochester, NY"] [Date "2000.12.02"] [Round "1"] [White "Cunningham, Sherman (NM)"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "1900"] [BlackElo "2390"] [PlyCount "60"] 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6 8. Nf3 Bb7 9.Nc3 $5 Be7 10.g3 $6 d5 11.Bg2 d4 12.Nb1 $6 Nb4 13.O-O $6 O-O ( 13... Nxa2 $5) 14.Na3 Be4 15.Ne1 Qd5 16.Bxe4 Nxe4 17.f3 Nf6 18.b3 $6 (18. e4 $1 dxe3 19.Ng2 $11) 18... Qe6 $15 19.Bb2 $2 Nfd5 $17 20.Nc4 $6 (20.Nec2) 20... Nxa2 21.Rf2 Nac3 (21... Ne3 $5) 22.Qd2 Rxa1 23.Bxa1 Ra8 (23... Rb8) 24.Bb2 $2 (24.Bxc3 Nxc3 25.e4 Ra1 $17) 24... Ra2 25.Nd3 (25.e4 $2 dxe3 26. Nxe3 Qxe3 27.Qxe3 Nxe3 28.Bxc3 Rxf2 29.Kxf2 Nd1+ $19) (25.Qd3 Nb4 26.Qd2 Na4 $1 27.Nd3 Nxb2 28.Ndxb2 Nd5 29.Rf1 Ne3 30.Rb1 Bg5 31.Qe1 h6 32.Kh1 Nxc4 33.bxc4 Qe3 34.Qf1 (34.f4 $2 Qe4+ 35.Kg1 Bxf4 $1 36.gxf4 Ra6 $19) 34... Qc3 35.Nd3 Qxc4 $19) 25... Ne3 26.Nc1 Nxc4 27.bxc4 Qe3 $1 (27... Ra8 28.Bxc3 dxc3 29.Qd3 Bf6 $17) 28.Qc2 (28.Qxe3 dxe3 29.Nxa2 exf2+ 30.Kxf2 Nxa2 $19) 28... Rxb2 $1 29.Qxb2 Qxf2+ $1 30.Kxf2 Nd1+ {(Igor Nikolayev)} [Event "NYS Ch."] [Site "Rochester, NY"] [Date "2001.09.01"] [Round "2"] [White "Taylor, Steven (NM)"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "2116"] [BlackElo "2432"] [PlyCount "70"] 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6 6.dxe6 fxe6 7.e4 $6 {This pawn counter-sac is dubious.} Nxe4 8.Bd3 Nf6 9.Nh3 Nxa6 $5 ({A simpler} 9... Bxa6 {also leaves Black with a great position.}) 10.O-O Be7 11.Nc3 O-O 12.Bg5 Nb4 {Black got all he wanted for free.} 13.Bb1 d5 14.Re1 Bd7 $5 {Offering a pawn anyway. It seems Black didn't feel comfortable enough with equal material.} 15.Nf4 h6 16.Bxf6 Bxf6 17.Nxe6 Bxe6 18.Rxe6 Bd4 19.Re2 Qh4 $5 20.g3 $2 Qf6 21.Qd2 Rae8 {Perfect mobilization against White's disharmony.} 22.Rxe8 Bxf2+ 23.Kg2 Qf3+ 24.Kh3 Rxe8 25.Bg6 $2 Re6 26.Rf1 Rxg6 27.Rxf2 Qg4+ 28.Kg2 d4 29.Rf4 Qe6 30.Nd1 Qxa2 31.Nf2 Nd5 32.Re4 Ne3+ 33.Kh3 Qb1 34.Qe2 Qg1 $5 (34... Rb6) 35.Nd3 $2 Rxg3+ $1 {(Igor Nikolayev)} [Event "RCC Sat. Open"][Site "Rochester, NY"] [Date "2001.10.27"] [White "Hayes, David (NM)"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "2247"] [BlackElo "2409"]1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6 8.e4! Nxd5! 9.Qxd5! {After the fiasko in the previous game David figured out what piece should take on d5.} 9...Ra7 ({Another interesting idea is} 9...Qa5+!? {For that see later games.}) 10.Bc4 Qe7 11.f3 Nb4 12.Qd2 Ba6!? 13.Bxa6 Rxa6 14.Nh3 Rd6! 15.Qc3 Rd3 16.Qc4 Rd4 17.Qc3 Rd3 18.Qc4 Rd4 19.Qe2 {White decides to fight on.} 19... Nd3+ 20.Kf1 Nxc1 21.Rxc1 Qd6 {Black feels comfortable anyway.} 22.e5 Qd5 23.Nf2 Qxa2!? 24.Ne4 Be7 25.Nd6+ Bxd6 26.exd6+ Qe6 27.Rxc5 O-O 28.Qxe6 fxe6 29.Ke2 Rb8 30.Rb1 Rb3 31.Rc3 Rxc3 32.bxc3 Rxd6 33.Rb7 {Remarkably, it was his last attempt to accept and punish my gambit. In all later games David preferred 5.b6 instead of 5.bxa6. It was a shame he didn't try 9.Qxd5 again. There are still resources for White, same for Black.} {(I. Nikolayev)} [Event "RCC Sat. Open"][Site "Rochester, NY"] [Date "2001.11.03"] [White "Stenclik, Douglas"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "1900"] [BlackElo "2432"]{This game with Doug Stenclik proved more convincingly than my previous one with David Hayes that even after 9.Qxd5 White has serious problems. Certainly he should not lose yet but his game must be extremely accurate not to get in trouble shortly. We need some more practice here.} 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6 8.e4! Nxd5! 9.Qxd5 9...Qa5+!? ({Just a week before, with Hayes, I played} 9...Ra7 {and it was a solid draw. This queen check seems to be more adventurous.}) 10.Bd2 Nb4 11.Qe5+ ({Interesting is} 11.Bc4!? Nxd5 12.Bxa5 Nf6 13.Bc3 Nxe4 14.Bd5 Ra6! 15.Nf3 Nxc3 16.bxc3 d6 {Black has no problems.}) 11... Kd8! ({Amazingly even} 11...Be7!? 12.Qxg7 Rf8 {is quite playable, and I had successfully tried it in rapid games. For example:} 13.Rc1 Qa4 14.b3 ({No better for White is} 14.f3?! Nxa2 15.Ra1 Qb3! 16.Be2 c4! 17.Nh3 Ra6! {and this position offers fantastic possibilities for Black. The move made in the game seemed more solid, if we can use such words for positions like this.}) Qxa2 15.Bxb4 cxb4 16.Bc4 f5! 17.exf5 Bf6 18.Qxh7 Bc3+ 19.Kf1 Qb2 {and even with 3 extra pawns White has no happy life, the position is absolutely unclear. Except that White may take a perpetual:} 20.Qg6+ Kd8 21.Qb6+) 12.Bc4 ({Of course White is crushed after} 12.Bg5+? f6 13.Bxf6+ gxf6 14.Qxf6+ Kc7 15.Qxh8 Nc2+ 16.Kd1 Nxa1 17.Qxf8 Qa4+ 18.Kd2 Qd4+ 19.Bd3 Rxa2) 12...f6 13.Qc3 Qa4 14.Bb3 {Doug thought that here, with the black king on d8, White could not be losing.} 14... Qc6 15.Ne2 Ba6! 16.Bc2 Bd6 {Suddenly White is feeling very cramped.} 17.f3? {It's losing but good advice is not easy in this position. Black has a lot of play.} 17... Be5 18.Qb3 Rb8 19.Bxb4 Rxb4 20.Qe3 Rxb2 21.Rc1 Qb5 22.Kf2 22...Qc4 23.Qd2 Rxa2 {White is so tied up that Black can afford grabbing pawns before the final strike.} 24.Rhd1 Qxe2+ 25.Qxe2 Bxe2 26.Kxe2 Bf4 {(I. Nikolayev)} [Event "RCC Fall League"] [Site "Rochester, NY"] [Date "2003.09.22"] [Round "1"] [White "Kharroubi, Clifton"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "2070"] [BlackElo "2376"] [PlyCount "34"] {The league is a long-term round-robin commitment. In playing sharp adventurous lines in these computer-era days, you should be aware in particular of strong home preparations. My opponent knew for sure that the gambit is an option. And he knew well my game vs. Lapshun. The question was if he knew my later game vs. Hayes. It turned out that he had not. Cliff is very good about home work. My 8th move certainly caught him by surprise. And after the 10th move, like David Hayes, he realized that things were going not the way White pictured.} 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6 8.e4 Nxd5 $1 9.exd5 $6 ({This robust looking recapture is not bad but may be a half step down from} 9. Qxd5) 9... Nb4 10.Bc4 {Also not bad, but maybe White should try something more creative than protecting his pawns. Black's own ideas may go farther then just regaining a pawn.} Qe7+ $1 {So far the same moves as in Hayes-Nikolayev, 1999.} 11.Ne2 $5 {Played after long thinking. Cliff improvises with a piece sacrifice that is incorrect. But even this move is not a bad mistake yet.} Qe4 12.O-O $2 ({Now after the only move} 12.Bb3 c4 $5 {and strong options.} (12... Nd3+) ( 12... Qxg2) 13.O-O {White would get a much better version of the bishop sac then he chose. For 12.Bb3 see later games.}) 12... Qxc4 13.Re1 Kd8 14.Nc3 Qd3 15.Qh5 Qg6 {Probably he overlooked this simple route to retreat and securely protect everything.} 16.Qh4+ f6 {White has neither attack nor compensation for material deficit.} 17.Bf4 d6 ( 17... Nc2 $5) {(Igor Nikolayev)} [Event "CCCR Wed Night"] [Site "Rochester, NY"] [Date "2004.04.28"] [Round "1"] [White "McGough, Mark"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "1828"] [BlackElo "2368"] [PlyCount "46"] 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6 8. g3 Nxd5 9.Qxd5 Ra7 10.Bg2 Nb4 11.Qb3 d6 $5 ({For} 11... d5 {see Iljinsky, Yaroslav - Nikolayev, 1986, game # 5004.}) 12.a3 $6 (12.Nf3 Be6 13.Qd1 Nxa2 $11 (13... Bxa2 $5 $11)) (12.Nh3 $5 Bf5 $1 13.O-O Be7 $5 $44) 12... Bf5 $1 13.e4 (13.Kf1 Be7 14.Bf4 Nc2 15.Rc1 Nd4 $36) 13... Be6 14.Qc3 {} (14.Qd1 Qa5 $36 (14... c4 $5 15.Ne2 Nd3+ 16.Kf1 Be7 $36)) 14... Qa5 $1 (14... Be7 $5 15.Ne2 Bf6 $36) 15.Bd2 $2 (15.Kf1 $1 Qb5+ (15... Qa4 $5 $44) 16.Ne2 Bc4 $44) 15... Qa4 $1 $17 16.Rb1 (16.Kf1 Nc2 (16... Na2 $5 17. Qe3 Qb5+ 18.Ne2 Qxb2 19.Bc3 Qb3 20.Qd2 Bc4 $15) 17.Rc1 Qb5+ 18.Ne2 Nd4 19. Qe3 Be7 $17) (16.Rc1 Na2 17.Qd3 Nxc1 18.Bxc1 Be7 $17) 16... Nc2+ 17.Kf1 Bc4+ 18.Ne2 Nd4 19.Bf3 Qb5 (19... Qa6 $5) 20.Qe3 $6 (20.Re1 Bd3 21.Bh5 $1 Re7 $1 22.Be3 Nc2 23.Bg5 Rxe4 24.Bf3 f5 $1 (24... Nxe1 25.Kxe1 Re5 26.Qxd3 $3 c4 27.Qc3 Rxg5 28.Nd4 Qc5 29.Bc6+ Kd8 30.f4 $132) 25.Bxe4 fxe4 $19) 20... Bd3 $1 21.Rc1 (21.Re1 Nc2 22.Qf4 Nxe1 23.Kxe1 Qxb2 24.Bc1 Qc2 $19) 21... Nxf3 22.Qxf3 Re7 {A spectacular finish, in a way. Black is a pawn down, underdeveloped and in genral looking ugly. However White is hopeless against his threats on the critical part of the board and will lose at least a piece.} 23.Qg4 f5 $1 {(Igor Nikolayev)} [Event "RCC Saturday Open"] [Site "Rochester, NY"] [Date "2005.03.12"] [Round "3"] [White "Gonzalez, Jose (NM)"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "2150"] [BlackElo "2422"] [PlyCount "110"] 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6 8. e4 $1 Nxd5 $1 9.exd5 $6 Nb4 10.Bc4 Qe7+ $1 11.Ne2 $5 Qe4 12.Bb3 c4 (12... Qxg2 {are alternatives, but winning the bishop seemed best. I felt confident accepting the sac since I had deeply analyzed it after my game with Clifton Kharroubi.}) 13.O-O cxb3 14.Nc3 {Considering that White will take the second pawn for a piece, his initiative and compensation look promising. Black has to play accurately.} Qd3 15.Re1+ Kd8 16.Qxb3 Ba6 $1 {Threatening ...Bc4.Limiting the white queen is the key of Black's strategy.} 17.d6 $5 {Seems logical.} Bxd6 18.Qxf7 {The white queen looks free now, and the black king is not secure. However now all black pieces are getting active, and it is one extra piece.} Qg6 $1 {Black's trump is that his own queen is also very powerful because she has no fear of getting traded. Plus Nc2-fork is a threat.} 19.Qxg6 ({Severe reality. If White declines the trade then the black army takes control over the board:} 19.Qf3 $6 Rc8 20.h4 $5 h6 $1 {and Rf8 to follow.}) 19... hxg6 {So White's initiative was not a real attack, and was only enough to destroy Black's pawns. The fact that the black king still needs to find a safe place and there are many pieces on the board, plus White has no weaknesses - still allows White some hopes, but only for a draw.} 20.Bg5+ Kc8 21.h3 {Setting a nice trap.} Nd3 $1 ({On} 21... Nc2 $2 22.Rec1 Nxa1 23.Nb5+ Kb8 24.Nxd6 {White obtains the upper hand.}) 22.Re2 Be5 23.Rd1 Re8 24.Red2 Bxc3 25.bxc3 Re1+ 26.Rxe1 Nxe1 {Black managed to maximally simplify the position converting it into a pleasant technical task when White can only passively watch what is to come. Due to the weak pawns on the left wing, White is lost.} 27.Rd6 $5 {White makes an attempt to win the pawns of the kingside but will lose an important one of his own.} Bb7 28.Rxg6 Bxg2 29. Rxg7 Bd5 30.Kh2 Nf3+ 31.Kg3 Rxa2 32.h4 Rc2 33.Bf6 Nd2 34.Bd4 Ne4+ 35.Kf4 Nxc3 36.h5 Ne2+ 37.Ke5 Nxd4 38.Kxd4 Be6 39.f4 Rh2 {The rest is simple.} 40. Rh7 Bf5 41.Rh8+ Kc7 42.Ke5 Bc2 43.Kf6 Rf2 44.Kg5 Rg2+ 45.Kf6 Rg4 46.f5 Rf4 47.h6 Rxf5+ 48.Kg7 d5 49.Ra8 Rg5+ 50.Kf6 Rh5 51.Kg7 d4 52.Ra7+ Kc6 53.Ra6+ Kb5 54.Rd6 Kc5 55.Rd8 Bf5 {(Igor Nikolayev)} [Event "RCC Sat. Open"] [Site "Rochester, NY"] [Date "2007.11.24"] [Round "2"] [White "Patrick, O'Keefe"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "1985"] [BlackElo "2368"] {Patrick demonstrates a pretty firm squeezing of the Nikolayev Gambit. Black has to solve all his problems through the c2 square. Even though achieving a draw is still no problem, Black never had winning chances in this game.} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. d5 b5 4. cxb5 a6 5. bxa6 e6 6. Nc3 exd5 7. Nxd5 Nxa6 8. Nxf6+ Qxf6 9. Nf3 $5 Nb4 10. e4 Qg6 11. Be2 Qxe4 12. O-O Be7 13. Re1 Qc2 $1 14. Bf4 $5 Qxd1 15. Rexd1 Rxa2 16. Rxa2 Nxa2 17. Bb5 Nb4 18. Ne5 Nc2 $1 19. Nxd7 Nd4 20. Nb6+ Nxb5 21. Nxc8 Bf6 22. Nd6+ Nxd6 23. Bxd6 Bxb2 24. Bxc5 Bf6 {(I. Nikolayev)} [Event "RCC Sat. Open"] [Site "Rochester, NY"] [Date "2015.08.22"] [Round "2"] [White "Manning, John"] [Black "Nikolayev, Igor (FM)"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "1845"] [BlackElo "2401"] [PlyCount "64"] 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.bxa6 e6 6.Nc3 exd5 7.Nxd5 Nxa6 $5 {The Nikolayev gambit is back! I think last time I played it was in 2007.} 8.e4 $1 {The most principled line.} Nxd5 $1 9.Qxd5 Qa5+ $5 (9... Ra7 10.Bc4 Qe7 11.f3 Nb4 12.Qd2 Ba6 {Hayes - Nikolayev, 2001.}) 10.Bd2 Nb4 11.Qb3 $1 (11. Qe5+ Kd8 $1 {Stenclik - Nikolayev, 2001.}) 11... Qa4 $5 (11... Ba6 $5) 12.Rc1 $2 Nxa2 13.Qxa4 Rxa4 14.Rc4 Nb4 $1 $15 15.Rc1 (15.Bxb4 $2 Ra1+ 16.Kd2 Rxf1 17.Bxc5 Ba6 18.Rc3 Bxc5 19.Rxc5 Rxf2+ $5 20.Ke3 Rxb2 21.Nf3 O-O $17) 15... Bb7 (15... Ba6 $1 16.Bxa6 Nxa6 17.f3 Nb4 (17... c4 $5) 18. Bxb4 Rxb4 19.Rc2 Bd6 20.Ne2 Ke7 21.Nc3 Ke6 $15) 16.f3 Be7 $11 17.Nh3 $6 O-O 18.Bb5 Ra5 $5 (18... Ra2 19.Bc3 d5 20.exd5 Bxd5 21.O-O Rb8 22.Rfe1 Bf8 $15) 19.Be2 Bf6 (19... Re8 $1) 20.O-O $2 (20.Bc3 $11) 20... Bxb2 21.Rb1 Bd4+ 22.Kh1 Ra2 $6 (22... Bc6) 23.Rfd1 $2 (23.Bxb4 Rxe2 24.Bxc5 Bxc5 25. Rxb7 Rd2 $1 $36 26.Nf4 $2 f5 27.exf5 Rxf5 $15) 23... Bc6 $6 (23... Ba6 24. Bxa6 Nxa6 $17) 24.Bf1 $2 (24.Bc4 Rc2 25.Bb3 Rb2 26.Rxb2 Bxb2 27.Be3 $1 Rb8 $1 28.Ng5 $1 (28.Bxc5 $4 Na6 $19) 28... Bf6 29.Bxf7+ Kh8 $11) 24... Nc2 $17 25.Bc4 Raa8 26.Bb3 Na3 27.Rbc1 Rfb8 28.Bd5 Bxd5 29.exd5 Re8 30.Nf4 d6 $19 31.Nd3 $2 c4 32.Nb4 Bb2 {(Igor Nikolayev)} [Event "2011 Golden Knights Prelim"] [Site "Correspondence Chess"] [Date "2011.12.01"] [Round "1"] [White "Godin, Eric (NM)"] [Black "Rofrano, Joshua"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "2200"] [BlackElo "2030"] [PlyCount "46"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. d5 b5 4. cxb5 a6 5. bxa6 e6 6. Nc3 exd5 7. Nxd5 Nxa6 8. Bg5 Bb7 9. Nf3 $5 (9. Bxf6 $5) 9... Bxd5 10. Bxf6 Qxf6 11. Qxd5 Rb8 $5 {A line found by the computer which it claims is =. In my initial notes I gave this move ?! but I've since changed my mind see my next note for more information.} (11... Nc7 12. Qe5+ Qxe5 13. Nxe5 d5) 12. Ne5 $5 (12. Rd1 Qe6 13. Qxe6+ fxe6 14. e4 Nc7 $14) 12... Bd6 $5 {This is where the computer starts to go a bit berserk. Initially you'll notice the evaluation spike but then they start to calm down and understand the compensation that black has after Nxf7} 13. Nc4 $5 {A critical moment has arisen Although frankly anything is possibly in this position. I would much prefer to play Black} (13. Nxf7 $1 {A move frankly I didn't consider, goes to show you can't see everything in correspondence play.} 13...Bc7 $1 14. Nxh8 Ba5+ 15. Kd1 Qxb2 16. Rc1 Rb4 17. Qf7+ Kd8 18. Qf8+ Kc7 19. Rxc5+ $17) 13... Bc7 14. Qe4+ Qe6 {Allowing a favorable endgame where Black controls the center and has better development} 15. Qxe6+ fxe6 16. O-O-O $5 (16. e4 $1) 16... d5 17. Nd2 Be5 18. Nb3 c4 $5 {Black has many ways to do this for example:} (18... Nb4 $1) (18...O-O) 19. Nd4 O-O 20. f3 Bf4+ $6 {spoiling an otherwise well-played game. Best was:} (20... Nb4 $1 21. e3 Nxa2+ 22. Kc2 Rb6 23. Rb1 Nb4+ 24. Kd2 Bxd4 25. exd4 Nc6 $17) 21. Kb1 c3 22. b3 Be3 23. Rd3 Bd2 $1 {The final nail in the proverbial "coffin". Of course white can play on with f4. but my opponent decided he had seen enough and resigned.} {(Josh Rofrano)} [Event "RCC Sat. Open"] [Site "Rochester, NY"] [Date "2017.04.22"] [White "Harris, Fred"] [Black "MacKenzie, Randy (NM)"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A58"] [WhiteElo "1900"] [BlackElo "2000"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. d5 b5 4. cxb5 a6 5. bxa6 e6 6. Nc3 Nxa6 (6...exd5 7.Nxd5 Na6 {is more accurate.}) 7. Nf3 (7.dxe6 fxe6 {and Black's Na6 is inconsistent. ...Nc6 fits this topography.}) 7...exd5 8. Nxd5 Nxd5 9. Qxd5 Rb8 (9...Ra7) {Immediately creates pressure on a2 pawn after Nb4. Not so important, but a good distraction which White must watch for. After ...Nb4 a3, the knight is not hanging and Black can use the b1-h7 diagonal quickly, which has been decisive in a number of games. The fact that the Nb4 isn't hanging is highly important. ...Nb4 with black rook on a-file look to be in better harmony than knight on b4 and rook on b-file; With rook on a7, queen can come to a8 like a new Reti! See my game vs Victor Iljinsky; From ...Ra7 the rook can make impressive lifts to d and e files.} 10. b3 Be7 11. Bb2 O-O 12. e3 Bb7 13. Qd1 Qa5+ 14. Qd2 Nb4 15. Bc3 Bf6 16. Bxb4 cxb4 17. Nd4 Rfe8 18. Rc1 Ra8 19. Bc4 Bxg2 20. Rg1 Bc6 21. Kf1 Qh5 22. Ne2 Qh3+ 23. Ke1 Bh4 24. Bd5 Bxd5 25. Qxd5 Qxe3 {(Igor Nikolayev)}
(pgn viewer courtesy of ChessTempo));